Difference Between SAST Vs DAST- Which One Is More Practical?

Table of Contents

Difference Between SAST Vs DAST

SAST stands for Static app security testing and DAST stands for Dynamic app security testing (DAST). These are the assessment methodologies that assist in finding security susceptibilities that may leave the company vulnerable to attack.

Introduction

SAST and DAST are two different assessment approaches. Each one is utilized in different stages of the software development lifecycle (SDLC). This offers different perceptions of the security and health of the app.

SAST is a white box testing technique that indicates that the tool has access to the app source code being assessed. It tests the code to pinpoint software weaknesses and flaws and the important vulnerabilities.

SAST does not need any functioning app. It assists developers in pinpointing vulnerabilities in the preliminary phases of development. It remediates all the pinpointed issues without breaking the development and permitting susceptibilities to damage the production. SAST provides the developers with actual feedback during coding and assists in guaranteeing app security that is taken care of in the software development lifecycle.

DAST is a black-box testing methodology. This indicates that the tool has zero access to the app’s source code. It tests an app while it is functioning to look for susceptibilities in a similar method an attacker would. By assessing an app in its functioning phase, the tool can execute replicated attacks to the system and see the systems response. This offers important insights into the app to see if it is vulnerable to attackers.

SAST vs. DAST- Which one is more suitable?

SAST and DAST both are techniques of assessing security vulnerabilities. However, they are used very differently. Here are a few main differences between DAST and SAST

SASTDAST
White box security testing The tester has access to the fundamental implementation, design, and framework. This app is assessed from all sides. This sort of testing shows the developer’s approach.Black box security testing The tester has zero knowledge of the framework or technologies that apps are created. This app is assessed from the outside in and represents the hacker approach.
Needs Source Code SAST doesn’t require a deployed application. It analyzes the source code and related dependencies without executing the application.
SAST does not need a positioned app. It sees the source code and relevant dependencies minusing the app execution.
Needs a running application DAST doesn’t need binaries or any sort of source code. It examines by implementing the app.
Identifying vulnerabilities earlier in the SDLC Scans can be implemented at different phases of the development procedure, entailing in the IDE, when code vulnerabilities can be identified at the end of SDLC.Identification of vulnerabilities towards the end of SDLC Vulnerabilities are pinpointed at the end of the SDLC or production.
Economical To Resolve Vulnerabilities The vulnerabilities are detected at the primary phases of the software development lifecycle. Majority of the issues can be detected and resolved prior to the code reaching QA. Very expensive To Resolve Vulnerabilities The vulnerabilities are identified towards the end of the SDLC. This leads remediation to being pushed into the next cycle.
Inability to discover environment-related issues and run time SAST tools scan a static code, they cannot attain visibility into possible runtime susceptibilities.Ability to discover environment-related issues and run time These tools utilize dynamic analysis, which is able to identify runtime susceptibilities. 

Conclusion

These testing techniques identify various sorts of vulnerabilities and they are very effective when utilized together in various stages of the software development lifecycle. Entailing both techniques as part of a company’s app security plan offers main insights so you can attain an enhanced understanding of the entire security posture.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What is SAST?

SAST is a white box testing technique that indicates that the tool has access to the app source code being assessed. It tests the code to pinpoint software weaknesses and flaws and the important vulnerabilities.

What is DAST?

DAST is a black-box testing methodology. This indicates that the tool has zero access to the app’s source code. It tests an app while it is functioning to look for susceptibilities in a similar method an attacker would. By assessing an app in its functioning phase, the tool can execute replicated attacks to the system and see the systems response. This offers important insights into the app to see if it is vulnerable to attackers.

What is the main difference between SAST and DAST?

DAST analyzes the app from the outside whereas SAST analyzes the source code.

Is SAST economical in comparison to DAST?

The vulnerabilities are detected at the primary phases of the software development lifecycle. The majority of the issues can be detected and resolved before the code reaches QA.

Diginatives has more than 5 years of experience in the software and app assessment. If you want it for yourself please contact us.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Twitter